The Peace & Power of a Positive Perspective


Posts Tagged ‘Leadership Communications’

I don’t know…

We’re in the midst of revising and retooling our sales training program; a periodic ritual all companies go through, you know?  The process we’re following might sound familiar.  Leadership has announced the strategic changes.  Now followership is being asked if the new direction will “fit” our sales constituents.

Naturally, we need to make the new direction “fit”, even if it doesn’t actually “fit”; the change has already been announced.  Though our change management process might sound backward, I’m optimistic the outcome will be favorable.

“Fit” is an often-debated concept in the sales (and sales training) profession.  Ask for input and there seems no end to opinions.  But “fit” is important:

Not a good fit’ is a great conclusion, if arrived at early.  It is a horrible miscalculation if arrived at late. 

Mahan Khalsa

We are late in our process, but it should be OK.  After all, our constituents won’t know the difference.  They only go through our sales training activities once, so they won’t be making comparisons.  Even if we suck going forward no one will know; keeping in mind we may not suck – we may have something better.  I am comfortable saying I don’t know.

He who knows most, knows how little he knows.

Thomas Jefferson

Although I’m change-adverse (like many in my profession), I’m keeping an open mind on the new program.  Philosophically, I’m in alignment with the strategic intent of consistency across all sales channels.  Others smarter and more successful than I have led their companies to greatness based on the principle of consistency:

I wanted to get the ‘creativity’ out of the sales process.  If you want to be creative, go write a novel. 

Larry Ellison

But to be fair, I believe there is a big difference between pronouncing a strategic change vs. developing and delivering the multitude of tactical details that go into the execution of such strategy.  I don’t know… but I’m think the key word here is execution.

We followers are supposed to be domain experts; we’re expected to execute on the plan.  What’s the military saying about battle plans – “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.”  (Here’s background on that quote.)

Helmuth von Moltke the Elder knew last century that the complexity of war prevented any one leader from grasping the entirety of details necessary to win battles.  The writer (Sean Newman Maroni) offers cross-over connections to the business world.  His cross-over has agreement from at least one famous business leader I know:

‘What do we need a sales guy for?’  I smugly replied, ‘To sell more of our software, perhaps.’  That’s an inside glimpse of our top management team at work discussing the expansion of our distribution capacity.  I knew we needed to build a sales organization, although I certainly had no idea how one worked. 

Larry Ellison

Even though Larry Ellison said he didn’t know (as published in the book Softwar: An Intimate Portrait of Larry Ellison and Oracle©), that didn’t prevent Oracle from achieving tremendous business (and sales) success.

When we launch our revised sales training program I’ll be a bit nervous about “surviving first contact”.  But I “know” we will improvise if necessary in the short term and adapt in the long term to insure success.

However, if in reality I don’t know, I’m comforted by titans of military history and the technology industry – if they don’t know; then it’s probably OK that I don’t know.  On the other hand, if you know – please let me know, OK?


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my past posts too:

Big hats…

2017 has been an “interesting” year – to say the least! It might be more accurate to say it has been an “extreme” year. Lots of alterations occurring all around us, true? Sometimes transformation is a good thing; sometimes seemingly not.

All change is not growth, as all movement is not forward.

Ellen Glasgow

When displacement occurs in the corporate world, employees spook easily. We want to know what this switch means to us; our role; our department; even the company itself. Leaders prefer we not spook so easy; leaders prefer we accept, rally around the differences. They’d like us to follow John A. Shedd and his big hat:

A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not what ships are built for.

I believe we’re willing – but need a little help – a little, well… leadership.

There has been such significant conversion occurring at my company in 2017 that I was recently invited to participate in a feedback session to help my company’s leaders ascertain what impact all of these modifications are having on employee engagement.

It was fascinating to hear the responses from my fellow employees of their opinions and reactions to the “adjustments” we have gone through (with the promise of yet more “improvements” to come). There were a wide range of views (some positive, some negative) on how assimilation has influenced our jobs; our daily routines; our future; our engagement.

For my part, I’ve been focused on our leadership’s approach to communicating shifts to the rank and file throughout 2017. This year has afforded me a bird’s eye view of who is stepping forward; who is wearing a big hat as all of us go through a time of revolution. Big hats are always in the spotlight during such times.

I pontificate about leadership often. I sometimes put on a big hat, myself. In his book Tribes©, Seth Godin offers these thoughts about leaders and leadership:

My thesaurus says the best synonym for leadership is management. Maybe that word used to fit, but no more…

Leaders have followers. Managers have employees. Managers make widgets. Leaders make change.

Change is frightening, and to many people who would be leaders, it seems more of a threat than a promise. That’s too bad, because the future belongs to our leaders…

And leaders must put on their big hat to lead change.

I believe we all experience significant change throughout our life. Maybe not each and every day; but certainly throughout each year. When we are the ones to stimulate the change, we feel good about what’s now new. We wear our own big hat and lead those around us that this change will be good.

On the other hand, when we are the recipient of unrequested change our reaction to the event can be quite different. In the corporate setting such change albeit inevitable, is still challenging:

As one IT Professional put it; “We’ve been reorganized, restructured, re-engineered, right-sized, down-sized, up-sized, TQM’ed, and MBO’ed, and if I hear the word empowered once more, I swear I’m gonna scream!”

Geoffrey James

During times of change followers look to leaders for continuous clarification. Leadership communication separates the true leaders from the imposters, or as it is said in the south;

Big hat; no cattle.

When our companies are going through cycles of uncertainty, I believe employee engagement is tied directly to the frequency, clarity and effectiveness of leadership communications. In absence of continuous word from the top, we look for our own big hats, yes?


Did you like this little ditty? You might enjoy my past posts too:

Historical leadership…

One of my favorite hobbies is reading about the leadership displayed by historical leaders during times of crisis as documented in the writings of American history.  It is amazing to learn about the stress that those events, coupled with the expectations followers, had on leaders.

How did those leaders do it?  Could you (or me) rise to the occasion the way they did?  What does one do, when there is no “opt out” option?  What does it take to be that type of leader?  Is it some sort of innate ability; learned; trained for?

Of course, there are many examples where leadership has been summarized in a simple synopsis.  Take the Civil War – a heightened time of crisis in American history.  On the bloodiest of battlefields in American history, great generals rose to the occasion and in so doing are remembered, albeit for what in retrospect seems to have just been good judgment:

Grant knew from Sherman’s telegram that a crucial lesson had been learned at Collierville, that an army commander should know just where he was going, long before he actually arrived there. 

Jeff Shaara

Know where you are going – seems so simple today.  But during times of crisis leadership can become anything but simple.  In Civil War times, navigating terrain was a huge obstacle.  No GPS; a few crude, hand-drawn maps; directions only available from local civilians – and we all know what hazards that can bring:

Winfield’s Dictum of Direction-Giving:

The possibility of getting lost is directly proportional to the number of times the direction-giver says, “You can’t miss it.”  

Unknown Sage

In today’s world, Google Earth enables anyone with an Internet connection to view the landscape with ultimate clarity.  Navigating business circumstances?  There’s no Google app for that.

Take my company.  We’re in the process of being acquired – maybe.  I say maybe, because surprisingly our leaders have vanished.  When the initial announcement was made public, there was a company-wide web meeting and the leaders informed the followers it was merely business as usual.  That was it then; and that has been it ever since.  No updates; no further employee communications; no status; nothing.  Not very comforting.

It could be that they really don’t have any updated information that can be disclosed yet.  As a publicly traded company, there are SEC rules and regulations that apply when a company is “in play”.  However, in absence of leadership communications followers will dream up their own narratives.  And in a vacuum, such narratives tend to drift towards worst case scenarios, true?

Speaking for myself only (as if there was another option), this event could be good news or it could be bad news for my continued employment at my (new) company.  But if my leaders asked, I would tell them I can handle it (as if there was a choice):

One can either face reality at the outset or one can disseminate the bad news on the installment plan. 

Norman Augustine

So when I read and reflect on historical leaders and how they led their followers, one common theme emerges – they kept their people informed:

The key to being a successful skipper is to see the ship through the eyes of the crew. 

D. Michael Abrashoff

I wonder if our leaders today invest any time learning from historical leadership.  Perhaps they believe their view of the ship is the only view of the ship and the right view of the ship and their followers on the ship should just get over it.


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my past posts too:

Seems familiar…

I wanted to publish this before the final outcome; seems like I’ve been in the situation before (see ).

Back then, my company was acquired.  New leadership did what new leadership often does; fired a lot of employees.   It wasn’t a surprise; I was told by a Vice President and friend of mine that the company was “in play” before I even took the job. It was a risk I accepted.

Under a “silver lining”, that event benefited me greatly; it resulted in me finding my current role which has been among the best jobs I have had in my entire, 40 year career.  Now in October, my current company will be acquired.


The feeling you’ve heard this bull before. 

Unknown Sage

I believe I’m the obvious choice to continue in my current role.  But – who knows what the new leadership will value?  It’s OK though; this time is quite different from the last time and that’s what I wanted to share before the final outcome is revealed.

You see, the last time I went through this my Manager(s) disappeared.  As soon as the announcement was made it very quickly became “every man for himself”.  I did not have one single business interaction with my Manager at that time once the announcement occurred.  Not a phone call; not an email; nothing.

His replacement, who was hired by the new company’s leadership offered the business courtesy of a phone meeting or two.  But when we gathered in Omaha for what turned out to be the “final audition” for a remaining few spots, my new manager was nowhere to be seen.  It was pretty obvious that I was not going to “make the cut” – and as I wrote about – I didn’t.

This go ‘round has been an entirely different and an impressively professional experience.  The Vice President I report to has maintained open and frequent dialog with his direct reports.  Often with these almost daily phone conversations he can’t offer me much in the way of substantive information – we’re still in a “quiet period”.  It’s all happening relatively quickly, but even so I and my fellow colleagues have been in limbo for what will turn out to be 3 months.

In spite of the obvious reasons for trepidation, here’s my boss – fearless in his willingness to maintain open and frequent dialog.

It’s one of the most challenging leadership skills of all – maintaining open communication with your reports when the over-arching theme could be bad news.  He has been unbelievably even-handed and totally appropriate with his updates.  He doesn’t speculate; he doesn’t preach hope; he simply sticks to the facts as he knows them – and we all take it one day at a time.  Regardless of the final outcome, his leadership strength is admirable; one we can all learn from.

For obvious reasons, we are all hopeful.  As I stated earlier, this time I believe I am the obvious choice.  But soon enough we will all find out if the news is good or bad. It will be interesting to see how things will be communicated:

The phrase, “I have good news and I have bad news”, is really just bad news. 

We all know this because we learn of good news this way; “You’re not going to freaking believe this, but…” 

Thanks boss for maintaining your dignity – and respecting ours – in the face of adversity.  This may seem familiar but I’m very confident things will turn out for the best, regardless.


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my past posts too:

15 and 50…

Observing leadership communications and leadership style have been an enthralling side benefit I have enjoyed throughout my career.  Of course in 2016 we are witnessing a big dose of our Presidential candidates’ leadership communications style.  I wonder what the journalists and historians will write 15 and 50 years from now.

What leadership communications style do you prefer?  Those who boast; blare; and blurt out the bigness of their bravado?  Those who calmly convey a collaborative and conservative approach?  Do we prefer political experience?  Intellectual superiority?  Business acumen?  All of the above?  Have your preferences changed over the past 15 or 50 years?

It’s been longer than 50 years, but Abraham Lincoln is recognized as one of America’s greatest leaders.  He had a particular leadership communication style, true?  What do you remember of his persona – his physical image?  His story-telling?  His unique way of managing people and politics?

My policy is to have no policy. 

Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln’s flexibility and willingness to adapt his “policies” to short-term circumstances is considered legendary.  But from a principled perspective almost every Presidential decision he made was grounded on saving the Union as being paramount above all else.  I think they will continue writing about Lincoln’s leadership 15 and 50 years from now.

Maybe you prefer leaders that advocate family-friendly work environments.  Much is being written these days about work-life balance; challenging and fulfilling assignments; the “gig economy”; more paid time off.  Of course, smart leaders don’t worry about employee vacation time – perhaps they follow the teachings of our favorite Unknown Sage:

Luten’s Laws

When properly administered, vacations do not diminish productivity: for every week you’re away and get nothing done, there’s another week when your boss is away and you get twice as much done.

Yes, I’ve enjoyed observing leaders and their communication style for more than 50 years.  Not just business leaders; but world leaders, sports leaders, even the leadership my wife displays as the patriarch of our family.  I’ve hoped some of their greatness has rubbed off on me – or at least appeared to have rubbed off:

The difference between being an elder statesman and posing successfully as an elder statesman is practically negligible. 

T.S. Eliot

Recently, Evan Goldberg Chairman and Founder of my company NetSuite, was interviewed for the benefit of the employees.  One leadership communication challenge is maintaining “contact” with employees when the company grows from a start-up to a multi-national corporation.  It’s been just a few more than 15 years since Evan launched his company with a great idea; a handful of employees; and a passion to succeed.

During this interview, one of the questions he was asked was about the type of employees he relies on to help with the company’s continued growth and success.  Evan cited two main attributes.

First, he looks for people who have “casual intensity”.  I like that description!  He described this attribute as those who work hard; invest long hours; willingly make personal sacrifice, without making a big deal about their efforts (and sacrifices).  These are the people Evan said that just go about getting the job done.

And the second quality of employee he prefers are those types of people you would enjoy going out to lunch with.  Coincidently, this attribute was echoed by my best friend Steve:

Never trust someone who doesn’t go out to lunch with you.

Well, truth be told I’m not much of a go-out-for-lunch-type.  It’s OK though – I doubt anyone will remember that 15 or 50 years from now.


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my past posts too:

Style and Subtlety – Boom!

Yep – did it again.  Yesterday I fell into that all-to-common digital trap of our modern century – I blasted a colleague (and friend) on IM.  Ate those digital words this morning:

Pratter’s Prayer

Lord, make my words as sweet as honey, for tomorrow I may have to eat them. 

Unknown Sage

It was the usual setting:  I was digitally multi-tasking; fast and furious.  It’s quarter-end; a stressful time that comes around… oh… just every 90 days (funny how that works).  The combination meant I could, “double my pleasure – double my fun”:

I try to take one day at a time, but sometimes several days attack me at once. 

Ashleigh Brilliant

I texted him a question; he texted back an answer; I didn’t like his answer; he didn’t like my question; I asked for an alternative; he said not a chance…  A frequent, digital argument expressed with directness and written in digital shorthand; punctuated with emoticons; all behind the shield of our monitors.

Collegial banter?  Depends on who’s the banterer and who’s the banteree.  That type of typing can quickly cut to raw emotions lurking nearer the surface during stressful times such as quarter-end.

We were briefly embattled with a “my way or the highway”; “I’m right – you’re wrong”; “compromise is for sissies”; “I eat Marines for breakfast” blast-fest.  Totally devoid of style or subtlety.  U2?  Been there done that I bet.  Not one of my proudest moments, digital or otherwise.

Style and subtlety; certainly diminishing dimensions in today’s digital era.  It’s actually worse than that.

Seemingly gone are the days of subtlety, statesmanship, irony, even sarcasm.  Texts and emails are written in black and white; read as black OR white.  Intentions behind the expressions are easily misinterpreted; feelings easily hurt; and everyone seems to have barbed retorts at the ready.

Even our political process has degenerated into a continuous barrage of confrontational accusations and insults vs. the skilled and stylish statesmanship of centuries past.  Oh they were direct back in the day, but within the context of a statesmanship image coupled with face-to-face bravery vs. digital cowardliness:

A story is told of a Woman Member of Parliament who, after an extensive tirade at a social function, scornfully told the Prime Minister, “Mr. Churchill, you are drunk”, to which Churchill replied, “And you Madam, are ugly.  But I shall be sober tomorrow.”

Today, we don’t know if the statesman’s statement was sarcasm or irony having not been there to witness the state of his drunkenness nor the appearance of his accuser.  Because the event was face-to-face vs. digital, there could easily have been expressions of irony or sarcasm that dulled the barbs of the barbs.  Stylish statesmen of centuries past were able communicators and skilled in the art of avoiding black OR white confrontations.

Statesmanship, style and subtlety of the 20th century?  Boom!  Sacrificed for the sake of today’s digital age.  Replaced by the barrage of black OR white hyperbole perfect for IMs, emails, emoticons, and the evening news.

In business, should we even care?  Can we stop hiding behind our monitors?  Is subtlety mightier than the digital sword?  I think our favorite, Unknown Sage still believes so:

Subtlety is saying what you think, but then leaving before anyone really understands what you meant.

Digital communications technology can be wonderful – when used properly.  It can also be barbed weapons; hurting feelings; killing relationships when not.  Too easy and too often taken as black OR white.  Agreed?  Well, if not… I’m right and you’re wrong!


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my website too:

What to…

Last week I shared coaching from one of my readers, John McCall (see ).  He used a unique approach – what not to do.  As a follow up to “Part 1”, John also offered a yang to his yin.

Before turning to a synopsis of his “Part 2”, let’s ask Wikipedia for perspective:

In Chinese philosophy, the concept of yin-yang which is often called “yin and yang”, is used to describe how seemingly opposite or contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent in the natural world; and, how they give rise to each other as they interrelate to one another.

So here’s John’s yang to “10 Sales Management Sins that Kill Sales Morale and Performance”, I like to call them “10 Golden Rules of Sales Management”: 

1. Honor what’s been working 

Take counsel from top sales people. To the extent possible, document their achievements, sales methodologies, philosophies and processes. Understand from their unique vantage point, what has motivated customers to buy. 

2. Always keep our appointments with our sales people… 

Reinforce the value of our sales people’s schedule and their precious selling time.  Quality coaching time with the sales team is a priority – perhaps our top priority. 

3. Treat sales people like royalty of revenue… 

Nothing infuses a business with enthusiasm and energy, not to mention revenue, more than a healthy, well managed and well compensated sales force. The old adage still applies, “nothing moves until somebody sells something”. Sales is a revenue centertreat is as such. 

4. Unite through diversity… 

All sales people are different. Their career backgrounds, selling techniques, territory and industry challenges, depth of product knowledge and history with the company almost always vary, widely.  Celebrate their differences and we will build camaraderie faster than snow accumulates in Buffalo in February. 

5. Play favorites 

Each and every one of our sales people (just like our children) is our favorite. 

6. Compensate unfairly 

Great sales people make more than marginal sales people; and they make more than their managers. That’s a good compensation plan doing its job. 

7. Share the “bluebirds”… 

Assign all new deals that flow into the organization on a round-robin basis.  Make sure the firm’s marketing engine continues to support the sales people. When trust exists they will fight for us. 

8. Remember who our customer is… 

New sales managers are hired to take control and run things better. Our customers are our sales reps; their customers are the well earned relationships they have built with their clients. 

9. Praise in public 

Every internal and client facing relationship a sales person has is based on caches of kindness, bonds of struggle and reservoirs of trust. Praise them for their toil – daily. 

10.        Listen to sales people with legitimate concerns 

Hearing what we don’t want to hear is exactly what management is hired to do. Our role is not only to fix problems and address concerns; great leaders actually seek problems out because we know the hidden ones are usually the most dangerous to the organization. 

Yes, the sales leadership role is challenging:

But even top management types are mostly harmless when you get to know them.  Given lots of love, some even make good pets.

Rick Levine

As John has coached us, knowing what to do is almost as important as knowing what not to do.  But when in doubt, we should worry more about the what not yin.  Then our team will gladly help us with the what to yang.


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my website and book, too:  The Peace & Power of a Positive Perspective© Please check it out.

What not…

Much has been said and much has been written about what makes great leaders and effective sales managers.  One of my readers John McCall, offers us stellar coaching from another perspective – what not to do.

It’s a rare person who wants to hear what he doesn’t want to hear.

Dick Cavett

I trust leaders and sales managers will benefit from this synopsis of John’s coaching points:

10 Sales Management Sins that Kill Sales Morale and Performance

  1. Ignoring what’s been working… 

Sales organizations can benefit from an infusion of new ideas and even new management. However, a common misstep is to discount the institutional memory and the very people that helped to build the organization’s revenue stream in the first place. 

  2. Cancelling meetings last minute… 

Every time a call or a meeting is cancelled at the last minute, the sales manager’s ignorance about the value of his salespeople’s schedule shows. This act sends two other signals:

      • Coaching time with my reps is not a priority.
      • As your sales manager I am overwhelmed and can’t manage my own schedule. 

  3. Treating salespeople like an expense…

Tinkering with commission plans; arbitrarily raising quotas; limiting incentives and you’re now speeding down a slippery slope.  So is your chance of hitting the company’s sales objectives; all to “save” a little. 

  4. Unfair comparisons 

All salespeople are different. While they undoubtedly share key sales-athlete traits like determination, self-motivation, and persuasiveness, they act and sell differently.  If sales management strips them of their uniqueness’s by categorizing them unfairly against their peers, resentment in the sales ranks accumulates faster than snow in Buffalo. 

  5. Playing favorites 

For a variety of reasons sales managers will sometimes favor certain salespeople and extend them privileges in multiple forms (i.e. leads, praise, promotions).  Never going unnoticed, other salespeople speculate about the motivations and the extent of the favoritism – and they despise it.

  6. Compensating unfairly for comparable roles 

The minute two peer salespeople learn one is compensated much better than the other for an equivalent job level you have a problem that jeopardizes retention – of both.

  7. Siphoning deals 

“Unassigned” Accounts (aka “ghost” or “house” accounts) can be a sales management sin. Trust is broken and your reps stop fighting for you.   After all, why would they when you aren’t fighting for them? 

  8. Hijacking a meeting 

New sales managers are hired to take control and run things better. The dividing line is the well earned relationship the salesperson has built up with his clients.  Overzealous sales managers often swoop in and control meetings where the conversation and the established relationship get hijacked. 

  9. Punishing in public 

Don’t do it – ‘nough said.

10. Labeling a sales rep with legitimate concerns as a whiner 

Dave the sales guy contemplates for months his idea of approaching sales management about things that could be improved to drive the company’s sales performance. He talks to his peers. He weighs the pros and cons. Then he schedules time with the Sales VP and tactfully but unashamedly points out ways things could be done better.  The Sales VP acknowledges his concerns, expresses appreciation for the candid feedback then does exactly nothing and labels Dave a problem to be dealt with. 

We can all do better by not doing what we shouldn’t be doing while leading our teams, yes?  Thanks for the coaching John!  He also offered What to do, which I will post next.



Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my website and book, too:  The Peace & Power of a Positive Perspective© Please check it out.


Brevity is a skill, true?  Lord knows, it’s not one of mine!  (Can you say verbose?)

Oh well, at least my readers have patience – I hope!

Ever notice that some of the most historically significant speeches in American history are brief?  Take Martin Luther King for instance.  Famous for his role in leading the American civil rights movement, his still-cherished, “I have a dream” speech delivered over 50 years ago was brief.  According to

Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech was delivered on August 28, 1963 at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C.  He spoke for approximately 17 minutes.

Abraham Lincoln was even briefer. His most famous speech was less than 271 words.  According to

November 19, 1863

Perhaps no speech in American history has been more revered than this short message by Lincoln on the occasion of the dedication of a cemetery in the little town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

I was recently asked by one of my clients to interview two finalists for their firm’s marketing position.  Although I am a sales professional not a marketing professional, I agreed to do the interviews because I believe the sales and marketing communication disciplines (written and spoken) are blurring in the modern marketplace.

It took me about 4 hours to prepare for the interviews.  That included two phone conversations with my client; one with the CEO; one with his Recruiter.  I wanted to clarify the skills, attributes and/or characteristics they wanted me to focus on to insure I was not duplicating or interfering with areas they were focused on.  I also prepared a structured interview template (to prevent Mr. Verbose from appearing!).

I was following former President Woodrow Wilson’s “game plan”:

If I am to speak for ten minutes, I need a week for preparation; if fifteen minutes, three days; if half an hour, two days; if an hour, I am ready now.

It takes preparation to be brief.  In my case, I structured 4 interview questions.  Allotting time for the candidates’ questions of me, it was good preparation for 1-hour interviews.  The candidates were evidently not as familiar with American history; nor as prepared to be brief.

I’ve often associated this phenomenon with stress.  When we are in stressful, selling situations (and during an interview we are selling ourselves), if we’re not totally prepared we tend to throw more words at it, don’t we?  Well, that’s what they did.  And “throwing more words at it” is often not “better”.

He can compress the most words into the smallest ideas of any man I ever met.

Abraham Lincoln

I recapped my interview notes and sent them to the CEO and the Recruiter.  Since I am not a hiring manager for them, I stayed within the boundaries of my 4 questions and did not offer them additional opinions on candidate “fit”.  That’s their prerogative.

But this experience was excellent reinforcement for my sales and leadership responsibilities.  I mean, who can go wrong following Abraham Lincoln’s advice?

My friends, the less you see of me the better you will like me.

Of course, if we plan to apply a “less is more” technique, then whatever we select to include in the “less” better be the “good stuff”, yes?  And to insure we offer the good stuff, albeit briefly, we best allocate sufficient time to prepare.  Yet even with preparation, Mr. Verbose lingers near by.  But I digress – see what I mean!


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my website and book, too:  The Peace & Power of a Positive Perspective© Please check it out.

Giving our best…

I love football – it’s my favorite sport.  A bit ironic I suppose, because football is the epitome of a time in my life that I did not give my best.  Actually, it was worse than that; it was one time that I quit.

I quit my high school football team two weeks into the start of the season.  It was the only time in my life that my Mom told me I disappointed her. I can remember going into the head coach’s office to quit as if it just took place yesterday.  A bit ironic I suppose, because after being a starter and co-captain my freshman and sophomore years, I was not even going to go out for the team my junior year.   The coach called me over the summer and asked me to reconsider.

I acknowledged his request, but when I showed up I wasn’t prepared to give my best.  And the coaches weren’t prepared to coach me up.  Somehow I decided that quitting was the only escape.  I’ve regretted it ever since.  A bit ironic I suppose – it’s not the not-playing that I regret; it’s the not giving my best.

I bet there have been special coaches, mentors, and managers who have had a positive impact on your life.  Coaches come in all shapes and sizes and use a wide variety of styles and techniques.  I bit ironic I suppose – some coaches resonate with us; some don’t.

Here’s a 6 minute video clip about a high school, underdog football team, their coach, and his expectation to giving our best:

Probably not a technique that transfers into the business world, but his message does, doesn’t it?  A bit ironic I suppose – coaches aren’t magicians – we must help them help us.  And in return for their knowledge, enthusiasm, and time; they only ask we give our best.

In business, our favorite, Unknown Sage offers:

Common misconceptions about coaching in the marketplace: 

  • “Coaching is primarily for correcting behavior” – If we only coach people when they do something wrong, we have missed the point.  It’s about building not fixing.
  • “Coaching requires giving up power and control” – The manager relies more on influence. The person is still accountable.
  • “Coaching takes too much time” – Coaching takes too much time if you don’t do enough of it and you don’t do it correctly.
  • “Coaching is soft stuff” – The manager who avoids soft stuff usually does so because it is so hard.  The work is easy; people are difficult.
  • “Coaching is laissez-faire management” – Freedom in the workplace, actually just about anywhere, is rooted in strict discipline.
  • “Coaching is simply being a good cheerleader” – A good manager has the courage and inner strength when needed to tell people the truth.
  • “Coaching is like therapy” – To be a good manager and coach one does need a basic understanding of human behavior and motivation, but therapy has no place in your relationship with the people you are leading.

Coaches enjoy occasional accolades, too.  The best I ever heard was a tribute to Bum Phillips, head coach of the then, Houston Oilers.  It was once said of Bum:

He could take his and beat yours – and then he could take yours and beat his. 

A bit ironic I suppose, but they gave their best to him.  It’s a good idea to find a coach to help us commit to giving our best too, yes?


Did you like this little ditty?  You might enjoy my website and book, too:  The Peace & Power of a Positive Perspective© Please check it out.